Biden administration files its brief with the Supreme Court, defending student loan forgiveness
The Biden administration has filed a legal brief with the U.S. Supreme Court defending its plan to cancel hundreds of billions of dollars in student debt.
In its arguments filed with the highest court, the lawyers argued that the legal challenges to its plan were brought by parties that failed to show harm from the policy. The attorneys also refuted that the Biden administration was overstepping its authority, and laid out how it it is acting within the law.The Biden administration has filed a legal brief with the U.S. Supreme Court defending its plan to cancel hundreds of billions of dollars in student debt.submitted late Wednesday, lawyers for the U.S. Department of Education and U.S.
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Student debt relief: Where borrowers stand as Supreme Court weighs Biden’s planIn the months since Biden's student loan forgiveness program was announced, federal student loan holders have been left in the dark about if and when their debt could be canceled after several challenges came forward.
Read more »
U.S. defends Biden's student debt relief plan in Supreme Court briefThe U.S. Justice Department filed a brief with the Supreme Court late on Wednesday defending President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in federal student loans, arguing that two cases lacked standing to challenge the debt relief.
Read more »
Biden urges Supreme Court to allow stalled student loan forgiveness effort to take effectPresident Joe Biden's administration on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to uphold his beleaguered student loan forgiveness plan that would wipe away debt owed by tens of millions of Americans.
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court: Cleveland doesn’t have to refund millions in traffic-camera ticketsICYMI: Last week's 4-3 ruling likely brings an end to a case filed more than 13 years ago, before Cleveland residents voted in 2014 to shut down the city’s traffic-camera program altogether.
Read more »
Gorsuch dissent on Title 42: Supreme Court not ‘policymakers of last resort’In a recent case before the Supreme Court, several Republican states argued in Arizona v. Mayorkas that the Title 42 orders — which essentially allow the federal government to prevent certain people from coming into the country during a public health emergency because of the fear of communicable disease (in this case, COVID-19) — must remain in place.
Read more »
Supreme Court to hear major Big Tech cases that could reshape internet regulationsThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next month in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, two cases that will weigh the limits of Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which shields Big Tech companies and other online platforms from lawsuits for hosting and moderating user…
Read more »