+34
The European Court of Human Rights has found that the fair trial rights of Kenneth Brunell and Barry McArdle, two Dubliners convicted of murdering Keith Ennis in the Netherlands, were breached by the Amsterdam court of appeal. Both men are serving 13-year prison terms. The ECHR ruled that the appeal court failed to hear evidence in person from a key witness identified only as witness X. The witness had accused the men of killing Ennis, dismembering his body, and dumping the remains in a canal in 2009, but the original regional court acquitted them in 2017 citing unreliable testimony. The men were extradited from Ireland in 2014 after dismembered remains were discovered in bin bags in an Amsterdam canal.
Several bin bags containing the dismembered remains of Dublin man Keith Ennis were found in an Amsterdam canal in February 2009. Photograph: Melissa Schriek/The New York TimesThe appropriate remedy for Dublin ers Kenneth Brunell, from Palmerstown, and Barry McArdle, from Drimnagh, who are serving 13-year prison terms in the, is to have their cases reopened because the appeal court failed to hear evidence in person from a key witness, the ECHR held on Tuesday.
It found the men’s fair trial rights under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights were breached by the Amsterdam court of appeal in its May 2018 decision overturning their earlier acquittals on charges of killing Keith Ennis . Both were extradited from Ireland in 2014 to stand trial after a suitcase and several bin bags containing the dismembered remains of Ennis were found in an Amsterdam canal in February 2009.
Man jailed for murder of father of five in Cork golf-club attackEnnis was believed to have fled Ireland while facing gun and drug charges and Dutch investigators concluded he had been stabbed in a Rotterdam apartment a week earlier. Another Irishman, identified only as witness X, who had been staying in the apartment, accused Brunell and McArdle of killing Ennis, cutting up the body and helping to dump the remains. They strongly disputed those claims.
In 2017, the Amsterdam regional court found X’s evidence was not sufficiently reliable to support a verdict of manslaughter. It noted X had only incriminated the two accused after he had seen the case file and realised phone tracking data placed him at the scene.
While phone records placed the men in the apartment, and DNA linked McArdle to the chainsaw used to dismember Ennis, the regional court said the only evidence about the men’s alleged roles in the actual killing was from X and it was not sufficiently reliable. It acquitted Brunell and McArdle of murder and manslaughter but convicted them of unlawfully disposing of the body and sentenced both to two years.
A year later, the Amsterdam court of appeal allowed an appeal by the public prosecutor over the regional court’s verdict. On foot of X’s written statements, it convicted both men of manslaughter and increased their sentences to 13 years. Both men appealed on points of law to the Dutch supreme court, which upheld the appeal court’s decision. The ECHR later agreed to hear a further appeal.
The European court on Tuesday found the court of appeal had reassessed the facts and the applicants’ guilt while relying on decisive testimony from a key witness whose credibility was central to the case without hearing him in person, despite that credibility having been seriously called into question. This meant the appeal court had no opportunity to directly assess his reliability, which was “incompatible” with the principle of immediacy, requiring courts to use original, primary evidence.
That undermined the fairness of the proceedings as a whole, it held. The court noted, in the absence of any conclusive forensic evidence, the appeal court had found important aspects of X’s statement were corroborated by objective material and could therefore be admitted in evidence.
The appeal court had referred to mobile telephone tracking data and information concerning travel movements corresponded to X’s description of events and also relied on the fact DNA belonging to McArdle and Ennis had been found on the chainsaw used to dismember the victim’s body. This material, the ECHR said, could only place Brunell and McArdle inside the apartment.
It did not provide direct insight into what had occurred there and could not reconstruct the sequence of events leading to Ennis’ death or clarify the individual roles or responsibilities of those involved. The appeal court’s assessment of guilt had hinged on the credibility and reliability of X’s version of events, it said. In these circumstances, the statements of X, and the weight attached to them, had been “decisive”.
Legal aid row pushing District Courts towards ‘Covid era backlogs’, solicitors warnAssault case against MP Jim Shannon ongoing for three years, court hearsGP and elderly mother awarded €12,000 over Dundrum clinic receptionist’s ‘disrespectful’ conductHolly Cairns repays €8,500 in expenses mistakenly paid by Oireachtas during maternity leaveCharlie Kirk murder suspect Tyler Robinson pleads not guilty as judge sends case to trial
European Court Of Human Rights Amsterdam Dublin Keith Ennis Fair Trial Rights Murder Extradition Witness Testimony
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Man denied legal costs after successful bail challenge following theft chargesA man who was initially refused bail on theft charges and later secured bail through Article 40 constitutional proceedings is not entitled to recover up to €45,000 in legal costs. The High Court ruled that because conventional bail was granted pending the criminal case, the Article 40 inquiry had become moot, as there was no ongoing detention for the court to examine.
Read more »
John Galliano Cancels Met Gala Exhibition Over Past Antisemitic RemarksFashion designer John Galliano has cancelled a planned exhibition at the Met Gala, titled John Galliano: Horizons, following criticism from donors over antisemitic and racist comments he made in 2011. Galliano, who was convicted by a French court and received a suspended fine for hate crime offences, acknowledged accountability for the pain caused and expressed deep regret. He also stated he did not want the controversy to distract from the work of the Costume Institute or place the Met in a difficult position. The Met Gala organisers were reportedly considering rescheduling the event to avoid coinciding with Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Read more »
US supreme court allows Donald Trump to carry on building $400m White House ballroomProject is at the centre of the president’s ambition to remake the US capital in his image
Read more »
Assault case against MP Jim Shannon ongoing for three years, court hearsStrangford MP has been accused of assaulting a woman on October 1st, 2023
Read more »