GAA Integration Plan in Turmoil as Chairwoman Resigns

Sports News

GAA Integration Plan in Turmoil as Chairwoman Resigns
GAA, Integration, Mary Mcaleese

Mary McAleese, the chairwoman leading the integration of the GAA, LGFA, and Camogie Association, has resigned. Her departure threatens to stall the process, as the organizations remain divided on the path forward for a unified Gaelic games body.

The development of the GAA into a cultural powerhouse was built on the work of both men and women. But it catered only for men’s sports.

Photograph: Inpho/Bryan Keane After four years of herding the three organisations towards integration into a single body in her role as chairwoman, McAleese’s resignation has thrown the cat among the pigeons. Her presidency was defined by “building bridges”: bringing people together to facilitate rather than force agreement. And therein lies the problem. The GAA clearly will not jump into integration; it will have to be pushed.

As members of these three organisations up and down the country shared their views of this latest publicity fiasco on the airwaves, it is hard not to be struck by how invested so many people are in Gaelic games generally, and the GAA specifically. The firefighters of 9/11: They were eating breakfast when the call came.

‘They all left’Westport Estate’s CEO on its two-year closure: ‘There’s a lot of money being spent here’ For a psychologist like me, the GAA offers a heady mix. It is a means through which people can define themselves in terms of club, county and country; friends, place and nation. The GAA isn’t just an organisation: for some of us it is part of who we are. This is a really important detail.

Because of this strong identification with the GAA, commentary on an issue relating to the GAA can be taken very personally. A few years ago Iabout the institutional misogyny that lay at the core of the GAA. I soon discovered just how personally that criticism can be taken. My charge against the organisation was interpreted by some men as a personal charge of their own misogyny.

They are what is referred to in psychological terms as “highly identified”. But institutional misogyny is, by definition, not a personal accusation. It isn’t about individuals; it is about what is baked into the fabric of the organisation’s governance, leadership and operational structures. It is the systemic discrimination against women that is built into the rules, daily habits and culture of an organisation or society.

The development of the GAA into a cultural powerhouse was built on the work of both men and women. But it catered only for men’s sports, while happily welcoming the labour of women in non-sporting roles. Just like the invisible work women so often undertake, responsibility for feeding, washing and organising clubs and players; corralling teams and driving to matches up and down the country often falls to women.

Today, though women are involved in many roles across the organisation, power – and all of the most important committee positions – remains with men. And the means of making money remains with the GAA. The visceral loyalty to the GAA, together with the powerful position it has occupied in Irish life, results in serious blind spots. This is often how it works: powerful groups in any society tend to be oblivious to their privilege.

They rarely have capture on how their privilege impacts less powerful groups. By contrast, built on a foreshortened history and reflective of the less powerful position of women in sport, and in Ireland over much of the lifetime of the GAA, the Camogie Association and LGFA come to the integration table as the junior partners, with fewer resources. For this reason, successful integration requires redistribution of resources.

The less advantaged groups require over-investment to bring them up to the level of the more powerful group. Despite how the term has been used and misused by the GAA over the last two days, this is what is actually meant by equity. It is a recipe for disaster to require the smaller, less resourced parties to fund their own levelling up. It simply will not happen.

LGFA and the Camogie Association are historically disadvantaged when it comes to generating resources. To expect that they fund themselves – as Jarlath Burns suggested on Wednesday – is not integration; it is just another way of shirking responsibility for women’s sports. There’s no doubt that a deep connection and commitment to the Gaelic games and the GAA will be driving the behaviour of those tasked with integration.

The integrity of the game, sporting clubs and the organisation will always be their main priority. But protecting the interests of the GAA is orienting the leadership to the financial security of the organisation. Because of their privileged position, they seem unaware of how this orientation is recreating the status quo: a culture that prioritises the participation of men and boys in Gaelic games.

While the Government seeks to minimise the resignation of McAleese, it is clear that GAA is marching to the rhythm of its own drum. It unilaterally changed the timeline and conditions for planned integration. This typifies the mindlessness of those who are powerful in society. And those who hold power rarely cede it voluntarily.

, money is by far the most important and has trumped the integration agenda. Women’s and girls’ participation in Gaelic games is being sidelined in favour of the GAA business model. But stalling integration isn’t just damaging to girls’ and women’s ability to participate in Gaelic games, it undermines the GAA’s reputation as an inclusive community organisation. This will be a hard one for many people, women and men, to swallow.

It will ultimately undermine their allegiance to an organisation that they have held dear. This debacle isn’t about the integration of Gaelic games; it is about the heart and soul of the GAA. Both men and women built the GAA. It’s time women were given equal treatmentDonald Trump expected to urge Ireland to buy liquefied natural gas from US during visitDamage to homes ‘likely’ as status-orange rain warning issued for three countiesBoth men and women built the GAA. It’s time women were given equal treatment

GooglePlease follow us on Google to support us
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

IrishTimes /  🏆 3. in İE

GAA Integration Mary Mcaleese Resign Gaelic Games Women's Sports

 

Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines

Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

GAA reneging on integration is damaging own goalGAA reneging on integration is damaging own goalDid they realise properly funded and promoted women’s sport might surpass the men’s game?
Read more »

O'Donovan says there is no reason to doubt GAA integration commitment after McAleese resignationO'Donovan says there is no reason to doubt GAA integration commitment after McAleese resignationSport Minister Patrick O'Donovan has defended confidence in the proposed integration of the GAA, LGFA and Camogie Association after Mary McAleese stepped down as chair of the steering group.
Read more »

GAA’s commitment to integration under scrutinyGAA’s commitment to integration under scrutinyIronic that row over misogyny erupted in the week Croke Park hosted largest women’s sporting event in GAA’s history
Read more »

Former GAA president Mary McAleese resigns from integration role over 'misogyny'Former GAA president Mary McAleese resigns from integration role over 'misogyny'The decision by former president Mary McAleese to resign as chair of the integration steering committee has led to bitter verbal exchanges. Explaining her reasons for stepping down from the role, McAleese didn't hold back in her criticism of the GAA - accusing it of reneging on meeting next year's deadline after four years of preparation and, much more disparagingly, of misogyny. Unusually for the GAA, this trenchant criticism drew an equally indignant response from its highest officials, with its president Jarlath Burns calling her remarks offensive and undermining of the substantial role women play at the highest levels of the association.
Read more »