+34
Same political parties who once let wealthy buy Irish residency now want tighter rules for others who live here
One of the annual Irish citizenship ceremonies, which are a rare feel-good story in a bleak news landscape. Photograph: Barry CroninThese changes would make the immigration system increasingly punitive in ways that have no clear benefit and seem driven more by a response to international anti-immigration agitation than by clear policymaking.
“I want to see more citizens, but I’m trying to restrain the level of growth in that number,” he said. My wife is one of those who will be affected: she is not an Irish citizen, but has spent years living and paying taxes in the State. We are moving back to Ireland, having spent some years abroad.
So the increase in the number of years of required residency for spouses to become citizens from three to five would affect us personally. It was billed as effortless London luxury.
Then tenants found out the rulesThis is far from the most drastic change in the law, however, with the requirement for citizenship outside of marriage rising from five to eight years, applied retrospectively. This would make Irish citizenship under Micheál Martin harder to obtain than This is coming from the same governing parties here that only closed the programme allowing wealthy individuals with no connection to Ireland to purchase residency while spending one day a year in the State in 2023.
Citizenship is still freely given to those who have never resided in the State and, in some cases, whose parents have not either, as long as descent rules were followed and every generation was correctly registered. Far from encouraging integration, this legislation will further entrench social exclusion of immigrant communities. O’Callaghan proposes to exclude prospective citizens from accessing aspects of the social welfare system if they wish to apply for citizenship.
Which aspects of the system are unclear: will it include jobseeker’s payments, child benefit and housing assistance payments? Immigrants who are PRSI taxpayers are as entitled to access State supports as any citizen, so excluding them from these systems is a fundamental betrayal of the social contract. It could also potentially expose the State to legal risks.
Even if some of these systems are not included, there is likely to be a chilling effect whereby immigrants avoid interacting with any aspect of State provision for fear of jeopardising their citizenship prospects. Every punitive step taken to appease a vocal minority will make immigrant communities less likely to trust our teachers, our healthcare workers, our civil servants.
If the goal of the immigration system is to integrate people into the fabric of society, this seems a policy tailor-made to produce disenfranchisement and social marginalisation. These changes are misleadingly presented as merely bringing Ireland into line with European norms. But there is no commonly accepted European norm, with more and less restrictive regimes in place across the Continent. This change would place Ireland among the most restrictive.
Most disturbing is the proposal to expand the grounds on which the Minister for Justice can revoke naturalised citizenship to include “public order and national security grounds” and the creation of a “streamlined process” to “fast track” such citizenship revocations. This continues a disquieting worldwide trend of creating two-tier citizenship.
To put it bluntly, if one’s citizenship can in effect be removed by fiat, one does not actually have citizenship.on the grounds of fraud and to remove the visas from others over dissent against government policy. The idea that Ireland should “fast track” or “streamline” such a grave decision is deeply disturbing. These are solutions in search of a problem. Irish media, to their credit, report on the large citizenship ceremonies that have taken place regularly since 2011.
They are a rare feel-good story in a bleak news landscape. People’s stories are warm, sometimes harrowing, often funny. What unites them all is struggle, determination and sacrifice. For one day at least, immigrants are not flat numbers to be made into political attack ads, but real human beings with comprehensible lives.
Now the way that O’Callaghan speaks, one would think that thousands are scamming their way into citizenship for no other reason than to thumb their nose at the Irish taxpayer. The opposite is true.
Citizenship is frequently more real to these people than it is to those of us born in Ireland; something precious because it was fought for.appear to be following the worldwide trend of anti-immigration mania, perhaps in the hope it will defuse the explosive social situation that their decades of underinvestment have created. It takes no courage to scapegoat those without power in society, but it demands a lot to resist the pull of reaction because you know it is morally right and socially sensible to do so.
Immigrant communities are criminally underrepresented in Irish electoral politics, so this would be a further step backwards. These policy proposals appear based more in a desire for Fianna Fáil to recapture conservative votes than to make the immigration system work. But drastic as the proposed changes are, they will not satisfy the voices calling for the demonisation of immigrants.
The British political system has sent itself into paroxysms for decades now over the issue, with each government, Conservative or Labour, further tightening the screws on immigration. The result has not been a tamping down of tensions but the reverse. Far-right riots are now too commonplace, with gangs of masked men last week atenacting some sort of terrorising street theatre against the “small boats” supposedly menacing that nation. We should ask ourselves if we want that here.
For O’Callaghan, the changes he proposes may provide a temporary bump in personal popularity, it may even catapult him to the leadership of his party and the office of taoiseach. But for immigrants in Ireland it will mean more years of uncertainty and isolation, more gratuitous punishment for no greater crime than wanting to be Irish.
The Anglo-Irish relationship is best explained by a scene in Mad MenFour HSE regions to lose power over day-to-day spendingPatrick Bergin, co-star of Julia Roberts in Sleeping with the Enemy, seeks buyer for Offaly castleTrump pledges $5,000 for US citizens if Republicans win midterms during rambling speechBrent steady near $101 as Iran says it is prepared for intense war
Fianna-Fail Immigration Migrant-Crisis Donald-Trump United-States France Belgium Fine-Gael Marco-Rubio
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Jim McGuinness's contract with Donegal footballers extended by one yearDonegal County Board announces the extension of Jim McGuinness's contract as senior football manager for a one-year term. McGuinness, who returned for a second spell in August 2023, has led the team to two Ulster titles and an All-Ireland final appearance.
Read more »
Expect Jim McGuinness to tear up 2026 script as Donegal aim to rediscover mojoAfter peaking with a stunning victory against Kerry in the National League final, it all seemed to fizzle out
Read more »
Grand National-winning trainer Emmet Mullins to move into Jim Bolger's historic Coolcullen yardGrand National-winning trainer Emmet Mullins has confirmed he will move his operation to Jim Bolger's historic Coolcullen yard in Co Carlow, where he plans to expand his flat racing interests significantly.
Read more »
What problem is Jim O’Callaghan trying to solve with new hurdles to citizenship?Proposed changes smack of an attempt to pander to populist agitation
Read more »