Ohio's Supreme Court ruled against Attorney General Dave Yost for blocking a voting amendment based on its title.
Ohio's Supreme Court ruled against Republican Attorney General Dave Yost on Wednesday, determining that he had overstepped his authority by blocking a voting amendment's ballot petition based on the petition's title.What Did the Ohio Supreme Court Decide?In a unanimous decision, the court sided with a coalition of civil rights groups, including the NAACP's Ohio chapter, the A.
Instead, the court emphasized that Yost must 'perform his duty' by reviewing the petition's summary with a focus on fairness and accuracy.This decision underscores the judiciary's pivotal role in interpreting the scope of the attorney general's power in ballot measure certifications, highlighting an ongoing debate around voting rights and election law in Ohio.
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ohio Supreme Court: Democratic Justice Melody Stewart vs. Republican Justice Joe DetersThe nastiest of three Supreme Court races is between two current colleagues who sit next to eachother on the bench.
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court finds AG erred in rejecting voting amendment based on titleCOLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio Supreme Court delivered a blow to Republican Attorney General Dave Yost on Wednesday, ruling that he overstepped his authority by
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court rules in case expanding felony charges for animal cruelty to include straysThe Ohio Supreme Court decided unanimously that felony animal cruelty applies to all cats and dogs, overturning a previous decision from the Eighth District Court of Appeals.
Read more »
How Partisan Supreme Court Elections Are Shaping OhioOhio is one of seven states that elects state supreme court justices based on partisan elections — which can impact voters and campaign finance dollars.
Read more »
How partisan supreme court elections are shaping OhioOhio is one of seven states that elects state supreme court justices based on partisan elections — which can impact voters and campaign finance dollars.
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court finds attorney general erred in rejecting voting amendment based on titleThe Ohio Supreme Court has found that Republican Attorney General Dave Yost lacked the authority to reject a voting-related amendment’s ballot petition solely because he objected to the title. In a unanimous ruling Wednesday, justices sided with a coalition of civil rights organizations, including the NAACP, behind the “Ohio Voters Bill of Rights.
Read more »