+34
Project is at the centre of the president’s ambition to remake the US capital in his image
Construction of a helipad and ballroom can continue at the White House following Monday's decision by the Us supreme court. Photograph: Aaron Schwartz/AFP via Getty Imagesto continue building his controversial $400 million White House ballroom despite legal challenges, raising the likelihood it will be completed.
In a 5-4 ruling, the justices permitted the Trump administration’s request to block a lower court order that had halted above-ground construction of the project while a lawsuit by a historic preservation group seeks to block it. The US president, who demolished the historic East Wing of the White House last year to make way for the planned ballroom, has repeatedly touted it as “a gift” to the US people.
Monday’s decision from the supreme court comes after the court’s conservative chief justice, John Roberts, issued a temporary order that had enabled work to continue. António Guterres: ‘Superpowers need to understand things have changed’ However, Roberts joined the court’s three liberal justices in dissenting from the majority’s decision and wrote that the construction was “likely unlawful”.
The court’s decision may allow Trump to bring to fruition a project that is at the centre of his ambition to remake the US capital in his image. Since taking office, he has ordered the National Mall’s reflecting pool covered in blue liner, proposed a $250 million renovation to the Kennedy Center performing arts center that would see his name emblazoned on its side, and is pursuing plans to renovate a golf course and build a massive arch.
Whereas some projects have hit legal roadblocks, such as when a judge ordered Trump’s name removed from the Kennedy Center, or descended into farce, like when the reflecting pool line began falling off, the supreme court’s latest decision is a victory for the president. Trump celebrated Monday’s ruling in a post on Truth Social, boasting that the White House complex would be “one of the Greatest ever constructed in Washington DC”, with construction to be completed by the summer of 2028.
In an unsigned opinion, the five conservative justices said the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States lacked standing to bring a lawsuit against the project. The trust had centred its argument on the declaration of a board member, the architectural historian Alison Hoagland, who said the ballroom was an “aesthetic, cultural and historical” affront because of its design, and that she would suffer “injuries” when viewing it in Washington DC.
“The government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks standing to challenge the East Wing project,” the majority opinion read. “This court has not found standing in circumstances like these before. To the contrary, we have repeatedly held that mere offense, disagreement, or distaste does not qualify as a concrete and particularized injury.
” The justices also agreed that the government would suffer “irreparable harm” if construction is stopped, or only allowed to continue on a military installation set to be built underneath the ballroom while the above-ground portion remains unfinished. The majority ultimately sidestepped the question of whether the president’s decision to tear down a chunk of a building that rotates between presidential officeholders was actually legal.
The dissenting justices – Roberts, together with Democratic-appointed justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson – argued that the project was unlawful because Congress has not approved it. In his opinion, Roberts wrote that the construction was a “likely infringement of the legislature’s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue”, and said the majority’s ruling “is no victory for the separation of powers”.
“The ballroom is a building or structure being erected on federal park grounds – President’s Park – in the District of Columbia. Yet Congress has not passed any law resembling ‘express authority’ for the executive’s construction of it,” the chief writes. He also disagreed that the potential injuries to Hoagland are insufficient for the historic trust to sue, saying she was “deeply committed to the preservation of such historic American buildings” through her work with the association.
“Hoagland’s injury suffices for standing,” Roberts writes, likening the impact of the White House’s transformation on her to how “an environmentalist can sustain a concrete, particularized aesthetic injury from the extinction of a particular animal or the transformation of a particular forest or river that he regularly enjoys”. - GuardianJury convicts former gang leader of murdering rap star Tupac ShakurA Wicklow woman in Marbella: ‘I would make friends in the summer and they would then go home.
But I found my tribe’‘I’m officially retiring from my primary school - and I’ve had a good run’Lindsay Clancy trial: Jury to resume deliberations for fourth dayEU ministers meet in Ireland against backdrop of ‘significant security operation’
Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Aaron Donald Unretires and Rejoins Los Angeles Rams for 2026-2027 SeasonThree-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year Aaron Donald has ended his two-season retirement to sign a one-year, $20 million contract with the Los Angeles Rams. The 35-year-old defensive tackle, known for his key role in the 2022 Super Bowl victory, returns to bolster a defense already featuring Myles Garrett, aiming for another championship at SoFi Stadium.
Read more »
Trump Renames Lake Ontario to Lake America Amid US-Canada Trade DisputeUS President Trump announced on Thursday the renaming of the smallest Great Lake, Lake Ontario, to Lake America in an escalating trade feud with Canada. The order affects only the US Geographic Names Information System and has no impact on Canadian naming conventions. Google Maps stated it will display Lake America for US users while Canadian users continue to see Lake Ontario, and others see both names. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney rejected the change, while Democratic New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Republican Vermont Governor Phil Scott also opposed the decision. Ontario Premier Doug Ford unveiled a lakeside sign reaffirming the original name. The dispute is part of a broader trade conflict involving a 50% US tariff on Canadian steel and retaliatory tariffs from Ottawa.
Read more »
Trump says US will hit Iran with more attacks as conflict reignitesFirst exchange of fire between two countries in more than a month sends oil prices rising 3%
Read more »
Ireland should not greet Donald Trump’s theatre of the absurd with deferenceNothing to admire in US president’s bullying and provocation
Read more »