John O’Brien (31) claimed he had been subject to a practice that violated his human rights
A man who spent time in Cork Prison in 2013 and 2014 has lost a High Court challenge seeking to reverse a decision denying him compensation for being subject to the practice of 'slopping out'. Photograph: Alan BetsonA man who claimed he was subject to inhumane conditions in prison because he had to urinate and defecate in a bucket and then “slop out” has lost aJohn O’Brien claimed he had been subject to a practice that violated his human rights and took the action against the Governor of Cork Prison, theO’Brien , with an address listed in court papers as c/o Cork Prison, Rathmore Road, Cork , challenged the decision to deny him access to a compensation scheme due to his application being statute barred.
He was detained in Cork for periods between March 2013 and April 2014 and submitted that he had no in-cell sanitation and was required to urinate and defecate in a bucket in his cell, sometimes in the presence of other prisoners.Inside Trump’s surprise plan to ‘own’ GazaHe claimed he then had to “slop out” the contents of the bucket in the morning when his cell door was opened. The regime was a breach of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits degrading or inhumane conditions in prison and was also unconstitutional in Irish law, he submitted. In February 2020, the State Claims Agency established a settlement scheme to enable prisoners who had been subjected to a “slopping out” regime to claim compensation. O’Brien applied for compensation under the scheme in November 2020 and, more formally, in March 2021. However, in May 2021, solicitors for the respondents rejected the application as it was statute barred as it exceeded the six-year period allowed by section 11 of the Statute of Limitations, 1957. O’Brien sought a ruling to quash that decision and claim damages under his right to an “effective remedy”. In his judgment, Mr Justice Micheál O’Higgins said O’Brien emphasised the “historic” nature of the wrong, and contended that the effect of applying a rigid limitation to a scheme designed to atone for historic wrongs is that prisoners would be “shut out from claiming compensation, even in cases of an admitted wrong”. Mr Justice O’Higgins said it was claimed that the limitation “undermines, in a serious way, the core purpose of the scheme”. It had been claimed the State could have not applied any limitation at all or could have included a grace period. Mr Justice O’Higgins said O’Brien needed “to go further” than demonstrating that the scheme could have been devised differently. Mr Justice O’Higgins said O’Brien had not adduced evidence to show that his exclusion from the scheme was either oppressive or unfair in his personal circumstances nor had he demonstrated that Irish law during the relevant period failed to provide an “effective remedy”. He then refused the application and ruled for the respondents, who were represented by Remy Farrell SC and Conor Duff BL.Mother of two suffered multiple stab wounds in frenzied attack, court hearsShock and upset at death of couple in Kerry expressed by former colleagues of ‘brilliant, bright’ Hazel ByrneRestaurant review: This neighbourhood Indian spot has the potential to become a foodie destinationScotland v Ireland: Sam Prendergast set to retain place at outhalf with changes to be kept to a minimum ‘If we just focus on paramilitaries, we’re missing the bigger picture': Study on trauma in Northern Ireland shows need for concerted actionTrump’s Gaza plan: Israeli comments on Ireland ‘provocative’ and a ‘distraction’, says Government
Please follow us on Google to support us Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Couple from Ukraine take High Court case over alleged loss of welfare paymentsDecision sought to quash benefits refusal over alleged failure to reflect on ‘no material change’ to circumstances
Read more »
Conor McGregor: Nikita Hand to ask High Court to prevent CCTV publicationThe application is being brought by Ms Hand, who successfully sued the MMA fighter for damages arising from her claim that he raped her.
Read more »
Family Settles High Court Case After Man's Death Linked to Heart Attack ComplicationsThe family of Shane Nolan, who died five years ago from complications associated with a heart attack, has settled a High Court case against St Luke's General Hospital in Kilkenny. Claims were made that Mr. Nolan's discharge from the emergency department was unsafe due to the omission of a repeat blood test and a crucial cardiac assessment.
Read more »
Irish charities will be €2 million richer following landmark High Court rulingAround 550 retail stores owned by charities were previously subject to commercial rates, a property-based tax that nonprofits have been fighting for years
Read more »
Prince Harry settles High Court claim with The Sun publisher at start of trialHarry, 40, alleged he was targeted by journalists and private investigators working for News Group Newspapers (NGN), which also published the now-defunct News Of The World
Read more »
Man due in court after alleged pub car park assault leaves man fighting for lifeThe suspect is due to appear at Blanchardstown District Court following an alleged assault in the car park of the Clonsilla Inn that left a man in critical condition
Read more »